Thursday, June 28, 2012

It is a wonderfully historic day in America.


I am proud to support a former Constitutional law professor as President of The United States,


And I am proud to support the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (derisively called “Obamacare” by his political enemies). The American people support this act in almost all its parts, though a strong minority oppose it on principle amd a smaller group are confused about it and oppose the Act though they support its parts. A pretty large minority of the bill's opponents feel the bill does not go far enough!

First impression of the Results:
  • it will energize the far right- but they are already pretty well all-out enthusiastic opponents of the President.
  • it will also energize the President’s supporters. He has been validated as a Constitutional expert and as a leader. He has accomplished what Theodore Roosevelt, FDR, Harry Truman, John Kennedy, and Bill Clinton failed to do. What many of us have had as a major political goal for decades has been accomplished.
  • many independents and conservative Democrats will change their opinions as they see the benefits of this act and it has the increased authority of having been tested and having passed Constitutional muster in the Supreme Court.
  • the only part of the Act that was found wanting was the Romney/Republican idea of an individual mandate. The Democratic more-straightforward tax idea (which Roberts found in the Act de facto) has been accepted.

My joy is overflowing.  Just imagine:
  • Health insurance providers can NOT cancel your policy because you get sick. 
  • Kids won’t be denied health insurance because of pre-existing conditions, NOW.
  • Ordinary folks will be no longer be just one catastophic ilness or injury away from bankruptcy.
  • Parent’s health insurance policies can cover young folks until age 26, NOW
  • Grown-ups won’t be denied health insurance because to a pre-existing condition, as of 2014.


Thank you, Mr. President, for your leadership. You took a lot of grief from your base over your compromises, but I believe you got through a great, but flawed, reform that was probably about the best bill that could have gotten a majority in the Congress. You went for "what you can get" as Edward Kennedy advised you. The reform will be refined and improved over the years.

Thank you, Mr. Chief Justice, for putting, in this instance, right and law ahead of politics. I wish (barring an opportunity for another Breyer, Stevens, Souter, or Ginsberg) you had been on the Court in 2000. I wonder if things would have been different.

2 comments:

  1. Anonymous12:20 PM

    This is the first explanation I've seen that makes sense. There's so many spewing venom I did not understand what this all meant.

    Thank you for this blog. I enjoy it!!

    Jann Skeen

    ReplyDelete